SBIR Proposal Writing Basics: Who’s on First, and How’s in Your Work Plan
Gail
& Jim Greenwood,
Copyright © 2008 by
As
we review Phase 1 and 2 SBIR/STTR proposals, we continue to see work plans (aka
research plans) that lack the detail and depth that is needed to convince a
reviewer that the proposer knows how to conduct the research.
This can be a deadly mistake, especially for newcomers to SBIR/STTR who
have not created a reputation with the agency based on prior work.
Therefore, this month we will address this important part of your
proposal.
A
common problem in a sketchy work plan is the lack of specifics about HOW each
task will be accomplished. Most
proposers include WHAT is being done, but don’t talk much about HOW.
Let us use a simple example of what we’re talking about.
You
are planning a trip to
WHAT:
The “what” in this project is preparing for a business trip to
Now
how much confidence do you have, from that vague statement, that we have any
real understanding of what it takes to prepare for that trip?
Zilch, zippo, nada, none.
HOW:
First we have to figure out how we’re going to get there.
After consulting the atlas and asking the advice of the client, we
determine that flying through
Next,
we have to figure out what kind of paperwork is required to get into
The
other relevant part of getting into
Next,
we need to consider clothing. Living
in southwest
Okay,
do you now see the difference between just saying “what” you are going to do
in your SBIR/STTR work plan, and describing “how” you are going to
accomplish it?
One
additional suggestion: avoid using
the word “we” in your work plan, since the reviewer has no idea who “we”
is. In our example above, go back to
every place that “we” appears and replace it with the name of the person who
will be doing the task or activity.
So,
in your next Phase 1 or 2 proposal work plan, make sure to expand upon each task
with enough description of “how” you will accomplish the task to convince
that reviewer that you are credible in terms of being able to do this work.
And specify “who” is doing it, so the reviewer is clear on the role
of the Principal Investigator, subcontractors, consultants, and other key
players.