& nbsp;
SBIR Proposal Writing Basics: Love Letters
Gail
& Jim Greenwood,
Copyright © 2011 by
A very good way to
differentiate your SBIR/STTR proposal from other
s is to include at least one
letter of support from a third party. Such letters can add a lot of credibility
to your proposal, in two important respects. First, if they come from people who
know the market into which you will be entering in Phase 3, then they show that
your project has commercialization potential.
And second, letters that address the Phase 3 potential of your innovation
shows that you are focused on commercialization as the goal of your SBIR/STTR
effort—and that’s very important, since commercialization is one of the four
objectives of the SBIR/STTR programs.
Let us be clear: these
are letters from companies or organizations that are supporting the notion that
your SBIR/STTR innovation, when converted to product or service in Phase 3, has
potential for being a commercialization success. Therefore, we are not talking
about letters from academic, scientific or engineering experts attesting to the
niftiness of your technical innovation. We
are talking about letters from (as National Science Foundation suggests)
potential customers, funding sources, or strategic partners.
Strategic partners, in this context, refers to third parties that might
license or otherwise acquire your SBIR/STTR innovation so that they can take it
to the market place.
We’ve been asked what
such a letter should include. It should not be more than one page, and cover
something like the following:
1. State who the
letter is coming from, touting their position in this market place or otherwise
showing their knowledge and/or qualifications that makes their commercialization
opinion credible
2. State your
company name, and briefly summarize the
third party’s awareness and understanding of your SBIR/STTR innovation
3. Make a
positive and compelling statement about the value or importance of the
innovation within a certain market (or application, if it’s coming from an end
user, such as in a military program)
4. If the writer
is willing to commit anything to help move forward your SBIR/STTR innovation,
then the letter should say so: funding, licensing, putting it in their catalog
or product line, or providing a test environment are examples
5. Add any caveat
necessary to #4, such as making the commitment contingent on you achieving
certain milestones or your innovation “not being bypassed in the market
place”
6. The author
should offer to take a phone call or email from the agency to which you are
sending this proposal if there are questions about their support or commitment
7. Include a
signature, and indicate the position held by the writer
While
a good support letter adds credibility to your proposal, a bad letter detracts
from it. Here are a few things to avoid a bad letter:
1. Show a recent date—anything more than a month or two before the proposal due date loses credibility
2.
Show a
date—only thing worse than an old date is no date
3.
Put it on
“official” letterhead—reviewers are leery of letters on blank paper
4.
Letters
from consultants or universities are not credible if these parties are
subcontractors on the proposal. However,
a letter from a potential Phase 3 partner, which you are including as a sub
on Phase 1 or 2 to help in transitioning the innovation from your lab to
their production line, is very credible
5.
Generic
letters that are not specific about your SBIR/STTR innovation or its
application, or which fail to
specify the agency to which your proposal is being submitted, are less
effective
6. If you have more than one support letter, then each should be unique in its format and content. Two letters with verbatim wording are obviously written by one person, and the reviewer assumes it was you.
To that latter point: why
would YOU be writing the letters for these potential funders, customers, and
strategic partners? Actually, that is a smart strategy, for two reasons. First,
it helps you control the message so that the letter says what you want it to
say. Second, it is easier to get a third party to provide a letter of support to
your proposal if they don’t have to write it from scratch, but
only have to edit what you provide them, and then put it on their
letterhead over their signature.