SBIR Proposal Writing Basics: Job Creation
Gail & Jim Greenwood, Greenwood
Consulting Group, Inc.
Copyright © 2010 by
Greenwood Consulting Group, Inc.
We
all know there is plenty of verbiage coming from Washington about the importance
of small companies to the American economy and to job creation. So,
let’s focus this time on the value of including job creation in your
SBIR/STTR proposal.
If
we believe job creation is important to Washington, and we add it to the fact
that this is an election year, we conclude that Congress is going to be looking
for jobs under every rock and tree. We think that will translate into the SBIR/STTR
agencies, and their reviewers, putting particular emphasis in the coming months
on job creation in the SBIR/STTR proposals that they consider and fund.
Therefore, we recommend that you include, in your commercialization
portion of your Phase 1 or 2 SBIR/STTR proposals, some discussion of the
implications of your project in terms of jobs.
We think you should talk about jobs in several contexts:
First,
will your project likely lead to the creation of jobs when the
innovation/technology gets commercialized in Phase 3?
If so, say so, and offer some estimate of the number of jobs. Be
reasonable, and be able to explain how you came to your estimate.
Second,
will your project likely lead to the retention of jobs in Phase 3?
Again, if so, say so. If you don’t think job retention is important,
just ask any one of the millions of Americans who have lost their jobs during
this recession.
Third,
will your SBIR/STTR project lead to the hiring of additional personnel in your
firm, or at one of your subcontractors or consultants during the Phase 1 or 2
effort? If so, once again, you need
to say so. Sure, the number of jobs will be less than what might be created in
Phase 3 of your project, but the jobs you create in Phase 1 or 2 can be
IMMEDIATE jobs, which is important to politicos who want to take credit for near
term job creation.
A
word of caution about this latter category of job creation: be careful that you
are not trying to create more jobs than you can afford. Economic developers have
a bad habit of encouraging you to hire a bunch of folks, when the smarter thing
for your firm (and its financial health) may be to hire only a few. Personally,
we think it is a lot better to hire a few folks and create long term positions
for them in a financially sustainable business, than to hire a bunch of folks
and then terminate them a few months later when you find out you cannot afford
them all.
One
other quick caution: SBIR/STTR is still about innovative solutions to important
problems and needs. Commercialization is an ever-increasing area of emphasis in
these programs, but agencies do not fund SBIR/STTR projects with strong
commercialization potential if there is not an overarching need to conduct high
risk R&D to prove technical feasibility. Put another way, you won’t win an
SBIR/STTR award just because you can claim significant job creation if the
project itself is not an R&D effort focused on innovation.
Finally,
a word of thanks: We want to assure
you that there are folks like ourselves who recognize and appreciate the
contribution your small firm makes to the economy, and to the individuals who
you employ. We know firsthand that it takes a lot of work to create and sustain
a viable small business, so our hat is off to you. Thanks, and keep up the good
work!